Re: Android port

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu,  bruno@clisp.org,  angelo.g0@libero.it,
>   emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2023 17:54:50 +0800
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > If you can figure out why omitting those modules doesn't work, maybe
> > we could go that way as well.
> 
> I thought I did.

You said that those files are included in the list of object files to
build if Gnulib configury detects that asprintf is missing, right?

Then I don't think I understand this, since (a) MinGW64 which Angelo
uses does have asprintf, and (b) we could use the configure variable
that records the existence of asprintf to override that, like we do
with other ac_cv_func_* variables.  But for some reason you didn't use
that variable (or any similar one) in your proposed patch, why?

So to me this issue is still not clear enough.