[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:08:19 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
> GCALIGNED_UNION_MEMBER
Its purpose is to ensure that Lisp structures are aligned sufficiently
for mark_memory to locate its members when they are placed on the stack,
through the optional AUTO_CONS or AUTO_STRING mechanism.
> What I mean is a situation when we try to read sym->u.s.val.value, but
> the value becomes Lisp_Object value[].
>
> Then, realloc calls in other thread may create a race condition when
> accessing array element may point to obsolete memory address that was
> only valid prior to realloc.
My implementation used a lock around a linked list of value and function
cells, only taken if the thread sees that the list is not empty.
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, (continued)
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/16
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/17
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Po Lu, 2023/07/17
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/17
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Po Lu, 2023/07/17
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/17
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/24
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Po Lu, 2023/07/24
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/24
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Po Lu, 2023/07/24
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/24
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Po Lu, 2023/07/24
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/24
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Po Lu, 2023/07/24
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/07/25
- Re: Concurrency via isolated process/thread, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/07/24