[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages (was: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New pack
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages (was: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil) |
Date: |
Mon, 15 May 2023 18:15:13 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I think your guideline draft is good. It's a readable policy, and
written very clearly too.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, (continued)
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Akib Azmain Turja, 2023/05/19
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/05/20
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Richard Stallman, 2023/05/21
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Stefan Monnier, 2023/05/14
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Jim Porter, 2023/05/14
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Stefan Monnier, 2023/05/14
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Jim Porter, 2023/05/14
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages (was: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil), Richard Stallman, 2023/05/15
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages (was: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil), Jim Porter, 2023/05/16
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages, Madhu, 2023/05/16
- Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages (was: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] New package: devil),
Richard Stallman <=