[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Grammar checking
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Grammar checking |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Apr 2023 20:35:45 +0300 |
> From: Lynn Winebarger <owinebar@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 13:30:06 -0400
> Cc: gregory@heytings.org, nasser.alkmim@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org,
> m.eliachevitch@posteo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> I might have misunderstood - this thread arose because you mentioned
> that grammar correction was a higher priority than reimplementing
> spell-checking support
You have misunderstood. There's no precedence here at all. We need
(and already have) spell-checking capabilities in Emacs, and will
continue having and developing them. We _also_ need
grammar-correcting capabilities, independently of spell-checking.
> For me, this is primarily an intellectual exercise as I am not a
> contributor (due to legal ambiguities about my right to assign
> copyrights, not my willingness to do so), but I would like to
> understand how the standards are applied in this situation. Am I
> wrong about treating SaaSS consistently with nonfree software when it
> comes to promoting its use?
We are not discussing addition to Emacs of any features based on
SaaSS.
- Re: Grammar checking, (continued)
Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/01
Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/01
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/02
- Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/02
- Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/02
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/06
- Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/07
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/08
- Re: Grammar checking, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/08
Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/07
Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/08