[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Indentation and gc
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Indentation and gc |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:33:49 +0200 |
> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
> Cc: arne_bab@web.de, spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 15:01:47 +0000
>
> >> Indeed. But despite all of the best efforts, fragmentation increases if
> >> we delay GCs, right?
> >
> > Not IME, no. That's why the memory footprint of a typical
> > long-running session levels out.
>
> Then what is the mechanism of gc-cons-threshold affecting the Emacs
> memory footprint?
Because higher threshold increases the probability that some free
memory couldn't be released to the OS.
- Re: Indentation and gc, (continued)
- Re: Indentation and gc, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2023/03/11
- Re: Indentation and gc, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/12
- Re: Indentation and gc, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/12
- Re: Indentation and gc, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/12
- Re: Indentation and gc, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/12
- Re: Indentation and gc, Gregor Zattler, 2023/03/12
- Re: Indentation and gc, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/12
- Re: Indentation and gc, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/13
- Re: Indentation and gc,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Indentation and gc, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/13
- Re: Indentation and gc, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/13
- Re: Indentation and gc, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/13
- Re: Indentation and gc, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/13
- Re: Indentation and gc, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/14
- Re: Indentation and gc, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/14
- Re: Indentation and gc, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/15
- Re: Indentation and gc, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/03/13
- Re: Indentation and gc, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/14
- Re: Indentation and gc, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/11