[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: file-equal-p
|
From: |
Po Lu |
|
Subject: |
Re: file-equal-p |
|
Date: |
Fri, 17 Feb 2023 10:40:59 +0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:34:04 +0800
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> > It is still one more test, done for everyone.
>>
>> Is file-equal-p a function called in particularly tight loops?
>
> I don't know, but punishing everyone for the benefit of a single OS
> sounds wrong to me.
Why would a single conditional be punishment, though?
- file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/15
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p,
Po Lu <=
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/17
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/17
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/17
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/17
- Re: file-equal-p, Andreas Schwab, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Michael Albinus, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Po Lu, 2023/02/16
- Re: file-equal-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/16
Re: file-equal-p, Richard Stallman, 2023/02/16