Re: Unifying "foo-mode"s and "foo-ts-mode"s

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Cc: theo@thornhill.no,  emacs-devel@gnu.org,  casouri@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2022 16:39:18 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > I don't understand the question.  We provide to users _features_, not
> > their implementations in terms of files and variables/functions.  So
> > the symbols *-ts-mode are here to stay, and are not experimental
> > demonstrations in any sense of that term, but what they do under the
> > hood is up to us.
> 
> That answers my question.  The point is whether the usage of ...-ts-mode
> major modes is recommended or provided with a "we reserve the right to
> change anything"-like caveat, so one shouldn't rely too much on their
> public interface.

I guess it depends on who "one" is for this purpose.  Which code wants
to rely on these symbols, and why?