Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Tree-sitter introduction documentation

[Lynn Winebarger]

On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 4:50 PM Stephen Leake
<stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> wrote:
> > The functionality of libtreesitter is probably useful independent of
> > the tool used to create the module it loads, as long as it satisfies
> > the functional requirements. Would the treesitter authors be amenable
> > to establishing a documented ABI for that component so other
> > parser-generators could target it?
>
> That's worth filing an issue on the tree-sitter development site. I
> looked briefly, and did not see a similar issue.

Done - https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter/issues/2006

Lynn