[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!
From: |
Akib Azmain Turja |
Subject: |
Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages! |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Nov 2022 18:45:42 +0600 |
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
[...]
>> blow:
>
> Attached the wrong file here:
>
> diff --git a/blow.el b/blow.el
> index 15cfd75956..974f745d6b 100644
> --- a/blow.el
> +++ b/blow.el
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
>
> (defun blow--set-mode-list (symbol value)
> "Set SYMBOL's default value to VALUE, SYMBOL should be `blow-mode-list'."
> - (set-default symbol value)
> + (set-default symbol value) ;perhaps `custom-set-default' would be
> better?
> (when blow-mode
> (blow--setup-all-buffers)))
>
Thanks, and done.
> @@ -111,12 +111,12 @@ Don't modify this variable from Lisp programs, use
> `blow' instead."
> (sexp :tag "Mode line template")))
> :set #'blow--set-mode-list)
>
> -(defvar blow--original-lighters nil
> +(defvar blow--original-lighters nil ;why isn't the value initialised?
> "Hash table of modes and their original lighters or nil.")
>
I don't know. Anyway, I change to initialize to (make-hash-table).
> (defun blow--hash-exists-p (key table)
> "Return t if KEY is in hash table TABLE."
> - (let ((default (make-symbol "blow--nonexistant")))
> + (let ((default (make-symbol "blow--nonexistant"))) ;the prefix is not
> necessary, the symbol isn't interned anyway
> (not (eq (gethash key table default) default))))
>
> (defun blow--puthash-unless-exists (key value table)
>
Removed.
--
Akib Azmain Turja, GPG key: 70018CE5819F17A3BBA666AFE74F0EFA922AE7F5
Fediverse: akib@hostux.social
Codeberg: akib
emailselfdefense.fsf.org | "Nothing can be secure without encryption."
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, (continued)
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/21
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/22
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/22
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/22
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/25
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/25
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/25
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/22
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/25
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/25
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!,
Akib Azmain Turja <=
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/25
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/25
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/25
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/26
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/26
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/25
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/26
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/11/27
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/27
- Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages!, Akib Azmain Turja, 2022/11/27