[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Allow indentation styles by use of function in tree-sitter
From: |
Yuan Fu |
Subject: |
Re: Allow indentation styles by use of function in tree-sitter |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Nov 2022 01:13:28 -0800 |
> On Nov 7, 2022, at 12:00 AM, Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> wrote:
>
> Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> On Nov 6, 2022, at 4:52 AM, Theodor Thornhill <theo@thornhill.no> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Yuan!
>>>
>>> I was thinking that a quick way to enable indentation styles and
>>> customizable indentation styles is to also accept a function in
>>> tree-sitter-simple-indent.
>>>
>>> What do you think of the suggested patch?
>>>
>>> That would allow a defcustom such as
>>> ```
>>> (defcustom c-ts-mode-indent-rule-function #'c-ts-mode--some-specific-style
>>> "Indentation style of choice"
>>> :group 'c)
>>> ```
>>>
>>> and in the major-mode init:
>>> ```
>>> (setq-local treesit-simple-indent-rules c-ts-mode-indent-rule-function)
>>> ```
>>
>> Hmmm, does assigning treesit-indent-function fit the bill?
>>
>
> I might be misunderstanding what you mean, but I don't want to change
> the architecture, I just want the user to set their own as a
> customization option in a major mode. The function will just return the
> same stuff as it does now, but with a function as an available option
> that will be a little more flexible. See [0] for an example. The user
> can just set [1] to change the indent style. A quick workaround could
> be that each major mode just does this:
> ```
> (setq-local treesit-simple-indent-rules
> (funcall c-ts-mode-indent-rule-function))
> ```
> But that is a little less nice :-)
Ah, I see what you mean. I think funcall is perfectly fine. I also think you
can just define those styles as variables and use symbol-value.
Yuan