Re: Tree-sitter integration on feature/tree-sitter

[Yoav Marco]

References: <5bada349-2f43-4325-b696-70918584cd3d@email.android.com> 
<83mtfsuluo.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfpjhm33.fsf@thornhill.no> <83a6brufe5.fsf@gnu.org> 
<87pmkmhp8i.fsf@thornhill.no> <83v8ueuc7i.fsf@gnu.org> 
<73DE25BA-5EEF-4497-8F98-8C5F20853A61@gmail.com> <87v8uewfuq.fsf@thornhill.no> 
<B227CEAC-B3E9-45B2-B859-0C411CCECF3F@gmail.com> <87mtfkbt9n.fsf@thornhill.no> 
<1179E1EC-90EF-4989-BE1D-115498F77F60@gmail.com> <87k0ajygry.fsf@thornhill.no> 
<6EF70929-5759-4F1A-B878-0C1660FB6831@gmail.com> <87leuy5z46.fsf@thornhill.no> 
<2E68780C-9923-411E-A5DF-B1A54E2EC38B@gmail.com> <83k09fq0am.fsf@gnu.org> 
<38C272F6-828C-4478-9D90-326AF14D0C94@gmail.com> <87h74j2lin.fsf@gmail.com> 
<4C257709-0E3E-46A7-8CEB-569001EEE31D@gmail.com> <87edzm2vk8.fsf@gmail.com> 
<1CEC92F7-3CB9-48DA-887C-43CD4C58E406@gmail.com>
User-agent: mu4e 1.6.3; emacs 29.0.50
In-reply-to: <1CEC92F7-3CB9-48DA-887C-43CD4C58E406@gmail.com>

https://github.com/meain/evil-textobj-tree-sitter for example pulls
Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Also I think it makes more sense if you just fork it rather than making a 
>>> PR.
>>
>> Yeah, I don't really expect it to be merged.
>>
>> My reason for the PR is for it to be more of a talking point about
>> collaboration between treesit and tree-sitter-langs. I used
>> elisp-tree-sitter before trying the feature/tree-sitter branch, and I
>> really like the richness of its highlighting (which comes from the
>> highlights.scm files).
>
> Do you already have the highlighting working for treesit?

I only checked a few, but yeah, and the syntax highlighting is very pretty.

> If so, maybe you can packages it in a separate package and publish it,
> it would be a nice demonstration of treesit features.

I'm not comfortable with doing that, the query patterns update
frequently upstream (though ubolonton has been busy lately) and all I'm
doing is post-process them a little.

I could try to make a self-updating repo or something with CI -
highlights.scm changes from nvim's repo weeky.

Is that worth it? I thought people could just as easily use my PR
branch of tree-sitter-langs. That also takes care of fetching grammars.


  Sorry for the late response,
  Yoav