Re: Adding missing C-x 5 C-j and C-x t C-j commands

[Howard Melman]

Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:

>>> We have the "C-x 5 5" prefix for purposes like this one.
>>> It's a great fallback,
>>
>> It shouldn't be a fallback.  It should be "the new C-x 5" and it should
>> hopefully completely replace `C-x 5` at some point.
>
> Should the prefix `C-x 5` take keys from the `C-x` keymap?
> So any key in the `C-x` keymap will be automatically
> available in a key sequence starting with `C-x 5`?
>
> For example, `C-x C-d` is bound to `list-directory`,
> then the inferred `C-x 5 C-d` will show the output
> of `list-directory` in a new frame?

I have a question the other way.  I forgot that `C-x 5 .'
exists and tried `C-x 5 5 M-.' and was surprised to find it
didn't work (it opened in the same frame as if I just did
`M-.'.  Is it supposed to work or should I open a bug?

-- 

Howard