[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Clarification] (was: [SOLVED (magic?)])
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
[Clarification] (was: [SOLVED (magic?)]) |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Jun 2022 09:09:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> On Tue 07 Jun 2022 at 06:35, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> He said "private":
> I can now again access my private gmail account,
> In civilised world, employers do not dictate brands for private stuff.
> One has a choice.
Ok before this discussion is going to escalate, some clarifications
1. Since some 10 years or so, my university uses gmail. That is a
fact. Now I did not really care, because we had plenty of disk
space out of a sudden and I used free software to access my
account (either gnus or thunderbird/seamonkey). However, Tim
Cross pointed out, this is not "really" a gmail account, more a
service google provides for academic institutions. Now the
university requires me to send official email, using the official
"from" as provided my the university. There might be tricks to
use other SMTP servers but as other, I think Tim Cross being one
of them pointed out, users pointed out, this approach run into
problems concerning SPAM filters.
The information policy of my university concerning technical
details about the email accounts is murky at best. However they
told us, that we need to switch to 2 Factor identification and
*maybe* cannot access anymore imap and smtp the «usual» way. Till
now this did not happen, but it might in any moment. Fortunately
as Tim and other pointed out, I can use, what google calls a app
password that I have to generate. I find this a bizarre
design/security decision since this password is considerably
shorter than my original imaps/smtps password. Be it as it may
that seems to be a working alternative and allows me to continue
to use gnus.
2. I do indeed also posses a private gmail account (actually 2, one
of them is very old, the other I used just for the notify
extension of mercurial to send notifications to my collaborates
when pushing to public repository). Again I did not really care
about the things RMS mentions correctly on this web page, because
they don't apply to me, I still access my email using free
software and I encrypt my private mails so that google cannot
scan them. Now, since 1 of June indeed one cannot access anymore
the private accounts (at least I cannot) via imaps/smtps and this
is why I was worried and wrote my email. The app password
approach however works. Now, if google decides to discontinue its
app password approach and oauth2 is not going to work, in that
case I have to switch to any other provider, because I need to
access my email with free software.
I hope to have clarified any misunderstandings
Regards
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- [app password does not work (at the moment)] (was: gmail+imap+smtp (oauth2)), Uwe Brauer, 2022/06/02
- [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]), Uwe Brauer, 2022/06/02
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]), Tomas Hlavaty, 2022/06/06
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]), tomas, 2022/06/06
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]), Tomas Hlavaty, 2022/06/06
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]), tomas, 2022/06/07
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]), Tomas Hlavaty, 2022/06/07
- [Clarification] (was: [SOLVED (magic?)]),
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: [Clarification] (was: [SOLVED (magic?)]), Yuri Khan, 2022/06/07
- Re: [Clarification], Uwe Brauer, 2022/06/07
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]), tomas, 2022/06/07
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)] (was: [app password does not work (at the moment)]), Richard Stallman, 2022/06/09
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)], Byung-Hee HWANG, 2022/06/07
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)], Tomas Hlavaty, 2022/06/07
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)], tomas, 2022/06/07
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)], Richard Stallman, 2022/06/09
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)], Eli Zaretskii, 2022/06/10
- Re: [SOLVED (magic?)], Richard Stallman, 2022/06/11