[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Mar 2022 09:29:33 +0200 |
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:26:50 +0200, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
>>>>> <paaguti@gmail.com> said:
Robert> but ":1" is not a valid IPv4 nor IPv6 address.
Pedro> However "::1" is valid, as would be "FC01::33", The :: stands for all
Pedro> zeros.
Pedro> This for IPv6 _addresses_.
I am aware of this :-)
Pedro> IPv6 _prefixes_ conform to ([0-9-a-fA-F]{1,4}:)+:/[0-9]+
And this. Lars is checking for IP addresses here, not prefixes, hence
my suggestion to use `network-lookup-address-info' (which is a thin
veneer over getaddrinfo(3)).
Robert
--
- Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious, Robert Pluim, 2022/03/29
- Re: Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2022/03/30
- Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious,
Robert Pluim <=
- Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2022/03/30
- Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2022/03/30
- Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious, Robert Pluim, 2022/03/30
- Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious, Po Lu, 2022/03/30
- Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious, Robert Pluim, 2022/03/30
- Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious, Po Lu, 2022/03/30
- Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/30
- Re: master fbf2ed9a64: ipv6 addresses aren't suspicious, Robert Pluim, 2022/03/30