[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers a

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:22:43 +0300

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,  juri@linkov.net,  leungbk@mailfence.com,
>   emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:20:53 +0200
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> > Generating loaddefs.el in a clean repository always reports a couple
> > of prefixes it won't register, and for a good reason.
> It doesn't do that here -- perhaps it's in the Windows-specific bits?
> (Stefan, Stefan and I fixed all those prefix warnings in the GNU Linux
> build a few years ago, if I recall correctly.)

Hmm... I rarely bootstrap, so I guess my memories are outdated.  But
"years ago" doesn't sound right to me -- could you tell which changes
removed those "Not registering..." messages during the initial build?

Anyway, if the intent is to fix any such message if and when it
appears, seeing none of them as legitimate, then it's okay to make it
a warning.

> >> emake doesn't filter out everything that's a not a warning, so I don't
> >> follow you here.
> >
> > Then I don't understand why you mentioned it.
> Because it filters out everything that's irrelevant.
> > Juri wants this to be a warning because evidently he disregards (or
> > maybe actually filters out) anything that isn't a warning or an error
> > message.  That's why I said other messages are also worthy of us
> > paying attention.
> I agree, but you said you had to read the output carefully, and I
> pointed out that that's not necessary if you use admin/emake.

Which means we are in violent agreement, right?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]