Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter

[Andrei Kuznetsov]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> While tree-sitter may be nice and all, it doesn't seem to offer the
>> usual extensibility expected from Emacs.

> Which extensibility did you have in mind that TS doesn't support?

Let us assume that a generated TS grammar contains a (C) function akin
to `semantic-lex-unterminated-syntax-detected', and I wish to achieve
similar results to binding
`semantic-lex-unterminated-syntax-end-function' to a function of my
choice.  Would that be possible?