[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter'
From: |
Philipp Stephani |
Subject: |
Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter' |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Apr 2021 16:52:16 +0200 |
Am So., 11. Apr. 2021 um 16:40 Uhr schrieb Philipp Stephani
<p.stephani2@gmail.com>:
>
> Am So., 11. Apr. 2021 um 16:31 Uhr schrieb Philipp <p.stephani2@gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Am 11.04.2021 um 12:45 schrieb Colin Baxter <m43cap@yandex.com>:
> > >
> > >>>>>> Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > >> Am So., 11. Apr. 2021 um 09:51 Uhr schrieb Colin Baxter
> > >> <m43cap@yandex.com>:
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> > >>>
> > >>>>> From: Colin Baxter <m43cap@yandex.com> Cc: Date: Sun, 11 Apr
> > >>> 2021 >> 07:45:19 +0100
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I get a build with the latest pull of emacs:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Makefile:415: recipe for target 'seccomp-filter' failed
> > >>> make[1]: >> *** [seccomp-filter] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving
> > >>> directory >> '/home/redknight/git/emacs/lib-src' Makefile:396:
> > >>> recipe for >> target 'lib-src' failed make: *** [lib-src] Error 2
> > >>>
> > >>>> Are there no error or warning messages before the
> > >>> "Makefile:415" > one? If there are, please show all the
> > >>> messages.
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes, sorry, I missed the earlier errors. Here is the full list
> > >>> beginning after the attempt to compile seccomp-filter:
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------- Begin error list ------------
> > >>>
> > >>> CCLD seccomp-filter seccomp-filter.c: In function ‘main’:
> > >>> seccomp-filter.c:142:23: error: ‘SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS’
> > >>> undeclared (first use in this function) ctx = seccomp_init
> > >>> (SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > >
> > >> This is an interesting failure. Looks like seccomp.h exists on
> > >> your system, but doesn't contain the right definitions? What does
> > >> your config.log say about seccomp.h (not linux/seccomp.h) and
> > >> seccomp_init?
> > >
> > > I have appended below the occurrences in config.log for seccomp.h. (Do
> > > you want me to attach the whole config.log in a second email?) The only
> > > other mentions are multiple lines of the form
> > >
> > > 5090:| #define HAVE_LINUX_SECCOMP_H 1
> > >
> > > ending with
> > >
> > > 27758:ac_cv_header_linux_seccomp_h=yes
> > > 27771:ac_cv_header_seccomp_h=yes
> > > 29332:#define HAVE_LINUX_SECCOMP_H 1
> > >
> > > Hope this helps.
> > >
> > > ---------- Begin relevant portion of config.log -----------
> > >
> > > configure:17719: checking linux/seccomp.h usability
> > > configure:17719: gcc -c -g3 -O2 -pthread -isystem
> > > /usr/include/librsvg-2.0 -isystem /usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -isystem
> > > /usr/include/libpng16 -isystem /usr/include/cairo -isystem
> > > /usr/include/glib-2.0 -isystem /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include
> > > -isystem /usr/include/pixman-1 -isystem /usr/include/freetype2 -isystem
> > > /usr/include/libpng16 -isystem /usr/include/cairo -isystem
> > > /usr/include/glib-2.0 -isystem /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include
> > > -isystem /usr/include/pixman-1 -isystem /usr/include/freetype2 -isystem
> > > /usr/include/libpng16 conftest.c >&5
> > > configure:17719: $? = 0
> > > configure:17719: result: yes
> > > configure:17719: checking linux/seccomp.h presence
> > > configure:17719: gcc -E conftest.c
> > > configure:17719: $? = 0
> > > configure:17719: result: yes
> > > configure:17719: checking for linux/seccomp.h
> > > configure:17719: result: yes
> > > configure:17731: checking seccomp.h usability
> > > configure:17731: gcc -c -g3 -O2 -pthread -isystem
> > > /usr/include/librsvg-2.0 -isystem /usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -isystem
> > > /usr/include/libpng16 -isystem /usr/include/cairo -isystem
> > > /usr/include/glib-2.0 -isystem /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include
> > > -isystem /usr/include/pixman-1 -isystem /usr/include/freetype2 -isystem
> > > /usr/include/libpng16 -isystem /usr/include/cairo -isystem
> > > /usr/include/glib-2.0 -isystem /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include
> > > -isystem /usr/include/pixman-1 -isystem /usr/include/freetype2 -isystem
> > > /usr/include/libpng16 conftest.c >&5
> > > configure:17731: $? = 0
> > > configure:17731: result: yes
> > > configure:17731: checking seccomp.h presence
> > > configure:17731: gcc -E conftest.c
> > > configure:17731: $? = 0
> > > configure:17731: result: yes
> > > configure:17731: checking for seccomp.h
> > > configure:17731: result: yes
> > > configure:17733: checking for seccomp_init in -lseccomp
> > > configure:17758: gcc -o conftest -g3 -O2 -pthread -isystem
> > > /usr/include/librsvg-2.0 -isystem /usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -isystem
> > > /usr/include/libpng16 -isystem /usr/include/cairo -isystem
> > > /usr/include/glib-2.0 -isystem /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include
> > > -isystem /usr/include/pixman-1 -isystem /usr/include/freetype2 -isystem
> > > /usr/include/libpng16 -isystem /usr/include/cairo -isystem
> > > /usr/include/glib-2.0 -isystem /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include
> > > -isystem /usr/include/pixman-1 -isystem /usr/include/freetype2 -isystem
> > > /usr/include/libpng16 conftest.c -lseccomp -lX11 -lcairo >&5
> > > configure:17758: $? = 0
> > > configure:17767: result: yes
> > >
> > > ---------- End relevant portion of config.log ----
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > OK, looks like libseccomp is available and should be working. Does
> > /usr/include/seccomp.h contain at least some of the symbols the compiler
> > complains about?
> >
>
> Looking at https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/blob/main/CHANGELOG,
> I guess we need at least version 2.4.0 of libseccomp. I'll see that I
> can add a few more checks to configure.ac.
With commit 725fc96b706c57ef8ceca5e7d82b175d9a72e845, I've now
switched to using pkg-config, which seems cleaner anyway.
- Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Colin Baxter, 2021/04/11
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/11
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Colin Baxter, 2021/04/11
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Philipp Stephani, 2021/04/11
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Colin Baxter, 2021/04/11
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Philipp, 2021/04/11
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Philipp Stephani, 2021/04/11
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter',
Philipp Stephani <=
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Colin Baxter, 2021/04/11
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Andreas Schwab, 2021/04/11
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Colin Baxter, 2021/04/11
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Philipp Stephani, 2021/04/11
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Andreas Schwab, 2021/04/11
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Philipp Stephani, 2021/04/12
- Re: Build failure: 'seccomp-filter', Colin Baxter, 2021/04/11