[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Re: Ugly regexps
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Re: Ugly regexps |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Mar 2021 17:32:18 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I guess that's just saying that an RX-based dialog isn't
> available yet, not that it's inconceivable or couldn't
> be useful.
Indeed if we introduce some way to choose which dialect to use for
interactive regexps, I'd fully expect the RX syntax to be one of
the options.
I could also imagine one of the options to be DWIMish (i.e. use RX if
the regexp starts and ends with a paren).
Stefan
- Re: Ugly regexps, (continued)
- Re: Ugly regexps, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/03
- Re: Ugly regexps, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/03
- Re: Ugly regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/03
- Re: Ugly regexps, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/03
- Re: Ugly regexps, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/03
- Re: Ugly regexps, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/03
- Re: Ugly regexps, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/03/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Ugly regexps, Drew Adams, 2021/03/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Ugly regexps, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Ugly regexps, Drew Adams, 2021/03/03
- Re: [External] : Re: Ugly regexps,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: [External] : Re: Ugly regexps, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/03
- Re: Ugly regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/04
- Re: Ugly regexps, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/03/04
- Re: Ugly regexps, Mattias EngdegÄrd, 2021/03/04
- Re: Ugly regexps, Alan Mackenzie, 2021/03/04
- Re: Ugly regexps, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/04
- Re: Ugly regexps, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/03/04
- Re: Ugly regexps, tomas, 2021/03/04
- Re: Ugly regexps, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/03/04
- Re: Ugly regexps, Richard Stallman, 2021/03/05