[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: woman.el broken?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: woman.el broken? |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Mar 2021 07:18:59 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: stefan@marxist.se, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 15:42:09 -0500
>
> > Btw, it isn't just letter-case, but also "Foo Bar Baz" as opposed to
> > "foo-bar-baz", right?
>
> It can be anything, really: the pseudo-events used in the easymenu code
> is auto-generated from the menu entry's text, but in the "old-style"
> code, it's generated by hand by the programmer, so it's in general
> impossible to find one from the other. We can at best add heuristics.
Sure. I _was_ talking about heuristics, based on what I see in the
sources. We probably should have this in "Incompatible changes" part
regardless, since heuristics could fail.
- woman.el broken?, T.V Raman, 2021/03/01
- Re: woman.el broken?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/02
- Re: woman.el broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/03
- Re: woman.el broken?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/03
- Re: woman.el broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/03
- Re: woman.el broken?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/03
- Re: woman.el broken?, Stefan Kangas, 2021/03/05
- Re: woman.el broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/03/06