[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repol
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jan 2021 02:35:47 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> (I have the impression that we might be interpreting to much into
> the RelaxNG immutability. After all, things like RFCs are, in their
> way immutable -- you can't change RFC8555 and keep calling it by
> the same name.
GNU software usually follows standards, and occasionally departs from
them. (See node Non-GNU Standards in the GNU Coding Standards.) But
the standards a program follows are not part of the program itself.
You might think of using a standards document as part of the program's
documentation, but we never do that, precisely because standards
documents are typically immutable. Documentation must be free
(see https://gnu.org/philosophy/free-doc.html).
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, (continued)
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Ulrich Mueller, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, tomas, 2021/01/24
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Ulrich Mueller, 2021/01/25
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Ulrich Mueller, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/27
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2021/01/26
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/28
- Re: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/25
- Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/07