[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp
From: |
Christopher Miles |
Subject: |
Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jan 2021 03:29:27 +0000 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Christopher Miles <numbchild@gmail.com>
>> CC: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Stefan
>> Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>, "emacs-devel@gnu.org" <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
>> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 14:33:05 +0000
>>
>> > There could only be good things following this principle.
>>
>> If don't move this, then there is same reason to don't more others. Then
>> don't
>> change any C code which existed for a long time. So the result is don't touch
>> any C code.... A reason like existing for decade time is not a reasonable
>> argument. Should talking technically.
>
> Technical reasons are not the only reasons for our decisions; there
> are also project-management reasons and risks-management reasons.
>
> I also presented several technical reasons, you just ignored them for
> some reason.
>
I see, so can your point out which C code can be changed, which not. Then I have
a clear view and guide. Otherwise, some developer have to guess whether this
will disobey your principles.
>> An old house existing for decades, should not update it.... because it exists
>> decades. We should talk about why update it.
>
> This "old house" is being updated all day, every day. Just look at
> the Git logs. Let's not argue straw men, okay?
Sorry, I indeed have not read git log too much. I will read them now.
I git log list out your commits, found you submitted lot of commits. Almost half
of commits are modifying C source code.
I misunderstand you, I thought you're some guy who just talking and don't do
work. This is my fault and I admit it.
Anyway, I still think should port C code to Elisp code as much as possible. Even
it's small bettern than nothing.
--
[ stardiviner ]
I try to make every word tell the meaning that I want to express.
Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/
IRC(freenode): stardiviner, Matrix: stardiviner
GPG: F09F650D7D674819892591401B5DF1C95AE89AC3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, (continued)
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/01/15
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/15
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/01/15
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/15
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/01/15
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Christopher Miles, 2021/01/17
- RE: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Drew Adams, 2021/01/15
Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Leo Liu, 2021/01/15
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Christopher Miles, 2021/01/17
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/17
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp,
Christopher Miles <=
- Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/18
Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/01/17