[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: named-let
From: |
Tomas Hlavaty |
Subject: |
Re: named-let |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:48:53 +0100 |
On Mon 11 Jan 2021 at 17:36, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> We have `defsubst` to declare a function as inlinable
How does one find such information?
> With the advent of the native-compiler, "all implementations" is even
> harder to reach, since it means, interpreter, byte-code, and native
> code.
How is it controlled if something is interpreted, byte-compiled or
native-compiled?
- Re: named-let, (continued)
- Re: named-let, Tomas Hlavaty, 2021/01/09
- Re: named-let, Zhu Zihao, 2021/01/10
- Re: named-let, Tomas Hlavaty, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let,
Tomas Hlavaty <=
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/11
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/12
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/12
- Re: named-let, Andrea Corallo, 2021/01/12
- Re: named-let, Helmut Eller, 2021/01/12
- Re: named-let, Zhu Zihao, 2021/01/13
- Re: named-let, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/13