Re: [ELPA] New package: repology.el

[Clément Pit-Claudel]

On 1/4/21 12:12 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>    >     >     It doesn't have any links to the programs themselves, or even 
> pointers
>    >     >     to their home pages. Its purpose is to show which version has 
> been
>    >     >     published where, and who is maintaining that.
>    >     >
>    >     > That doesn't really matter, the list lists non-free software 
> packages
>    >     > and users can easily think that the program is free software (since
>    >     > there is no license information associated with it).
>    > 
>    >     Do you have an example?
>    > 
>    > nmap.
> 
>    What about it?
> 
> It is non-free software.

Are you equating "free" with "GPL-compatible", or did I miss something about 
nmap? (Last time I checked, nmap was FLOSS)