[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Confused by y-or-n-p
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Confused by y-or-n-p |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jan 2021 17:13:08 +0200 |
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net
> Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2021 01:03:00 -0500
>
> > > After this is included in a release, we can ask users
> > > to try the value t for a week or two and tell us whether they like it.
> > > Then we can tell which default is best.
>
> Adoption of a new release by users is
> > very slow; I wouldn't be surprised if a year passed before major
> > distros made a new release their main one. E.g., we are still getting
> > bug reports from people who use Emacs 25 and even 24, let alone 26,
> > although Emacs 27.1 was released 5 months ago.
>
> That is true, but it may not be a problem. To get useful results, we
> don't need most of the community to switch. It is enough to get
> answers from a variety of users.
Which users should they be, and how do we find them and reach out to
them?
They should definitely be users who have the just-released version
installed, which is why I mentioned the observation that the process
of upgrading to a new version is slow and takes many moons.
> Likewise, we should not be in a hurry about getting the answers. We
> can wait a few months if necessary while accumulating users'
> responses.
Let's say we have half a dozen of such features, and we need to wait
for the answers for a few months about each one of them. Who can have
a long enough attention span to manage such a polling system? who can
keep track of all those features even though we could switch branches
and release a couple of versions in-between? If someone volunteers to
do the job, then I'm okay with trying that, although I'm skeptical as
to success chances. If no one volunteers, I don't see how we could do
something like that. We don't even have a forum for conducting such
polls, let alone a tried and working procedure.
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, (continued)
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/05
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/03
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/03
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Juri Linkov, 2021/01/04
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/06
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Juri Linkov, 2021/01/14
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/15
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/03
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Richard Stallman, 2021/01/05
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/05
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Gregory Heytings, 2021/01/05
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/05
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Gregory Heytings, 2021/01/06
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Stefan Kangas, 2021/01/06
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/06
- RE: Confused by y-or-n-p, Drew Adams, 2021/01/06
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Gregory Heytings, 2021/01/06
- Re: Confused by y-or-n-p, Stefan Kangas, 2021/01/07