Re: empty-directory predicate, native implementation

[Michael Albinus]

Arthur Miller <arthur.miller@live.com> writes:

Hi Arthur,

> It was just to test if empty; but now empty is better served with asking
> just for one file and testing for null; and I was also thinking what to
> do with 0 count if asked for after I sent patch yesterday; it seemed
> like a bit more useful then just return nil early.
>
> I can send tomorrow one that just returns nil and exits.

Let's wait what Eli prefers.

Best regards, Michael.