[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:38:43 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> That leads me to my following proposal to rethink the design of
> xwidgets. Given that Emacs now has support for dynamic modules and
> it is now enabled by default, I propose exposing an interface for
> dynamic modules to define custom xwidgets.
I think that is a good idea. However, before we develop that,
we should recheck our defenses against nonfree dynamic modules.
Are they strong enough?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, (continued)
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Tomas Hlavaty, 2020/10/14
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/14
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Tomas Hlavaty, 2020/10/14
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Akira Kyle, 2020/10/14
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Tomas Hlavaty, 2020/10/14
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/16
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Arthur Miller, 2020/10/16
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Mingde (Matthew) Zeng, 2020/10/14
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Akira Kyle, 2020/10/14
- Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets, Mingde (Matthew) Zeng, 2020/10/15
Re: Rethinking the design of xwidgets,
Richard Stallman <=