Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos

[Robert Pluim]

>>>>> On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 01:14:40 -0700, Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> 
>>>>> said:

    Stefan> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
    >>> But it is true that it would be preferable if the code matched the
    >>> documentation.  In the interest of consistency we are better off
    >>> sticking to one spelling.  Note that we already had around 40 other
    >>> instances of "parsable" in our source tree.
    >> 
    >> Since renaming symbols involves some pain, do we really need to be
    >> 100% consistent here?

    Stefan> I personally don't have a very strong opinion either way, FWIW.

I think I prefer consistency between the docstrings and the associated
code to global consistency, and changing code is always risky, so Iʼd
prefer if the docstrings were changed back.

Robert
--