Re: master 95e8c7d 1/2: ; Fix typos

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 21:01:42 +0000
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> But it is true that it would be preferable if the code matched the
> documentation.  In the interest of consistency we are better off
> sticking to one spelling.  Note that we already had around 40 other
> instances of "parsable" in our source tree.

Since renaming symbols involves some pain, do we really need to be
100% consistent here?