Le dim. 4 oct. 2020 à 05:38, Richard Stallman <
rms@gnu.org> a écrit :
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I understand. However, suspending Emacs is a very infrequent
> operation these days, what with most everyone working in a windowed
> environment.
It is not "very" infrequent, when running Emacs on a tty. It is
somewhat infrequent. It wouldn't bother me to type the character
twice on those occasions.
However, C-z and C-c are the standard ways to get out of a program,
and if neither of them works, people will get trapped in it.
If C-z C-z is the way to suspend, and the first C-z (when it echoes)
displays a message such as "To suspend Emacs, type C-z again now",
I think that will enable people to get out.
C-x C-z is not adequate for this.
The exact same arguments could apply to C-c being "replaced" by C-x C-c.