[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A modern-mode?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: A modern-mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 23:53:40 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> The word modern has a negative meaning in that it implies that the
> rest of Emacs isn't modern -- why would users ever want to switch of
> "modern-mode" and use the un-modern Emacs?
How about Faddish mode?
Fashionable mode?
Mode mode?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: A modern-mode?, (continued)
- Re: A modern-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/16
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/17
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/18
- Re: A modern-mode?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: A modern-mode?, Ergus, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, tomas, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, tomas, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, tomas, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16