[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A modern-mode?
From: |
Thibaut Verron |
Subject: |
Re: A modern-mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:45:48 +0200 |
> "Modern" may give the impression that the rest of Emacs is old.
I don't see a problem there.
> Maybe emacs-beginner-mode, or some name that uses the word "familiar",
> or a synonym?
Such a name would convey the impression that those settings are for
beginners and that experts prefer not to use them.
- Re: A modern-mode?, (continued)
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Lars Brinkhoff, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/18
- Re: A modern-mode?, tomas, 2020/09/16
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Daniel MartÃn, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?,
Thibaut Verron <=
- Re: A modern-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/16
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Alan Third, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/09/17
- RE: A modern-mode?, arthur miller, 2020/09/17
- Re: A modern-mode?, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/18
- Re: A modern-mode?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/16