Re: A modern-mode?

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> Yes, let's find a different name for this.  I'd object to calling it
> "modern", because I disagree that vanilla Emacs isn't.

I think "modern" implies that one day it won't be modern any more, so
it's a fine name by me.  But perhaps it should be more specific:
`modern-2020-mode'.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no