[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes for emacs 28
From: |
Göktuğ Kayaalp |
Subject: |
Re: Changes for emacs 28 |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Sep 2020 10:54:57 +0300 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 28.0.50 |
On 2020-09-12 00:40 +03, Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds reasonable. But given that Lars had some reservations about
> doing this at all, perhaps we could just leave it at that. See his
> separate email about this.
Saw the message, yes, reasonable indeed. I’ve tried to make it as clear
as possible that it’s just a suggestion for the greater good of the
community, but it coming from a place of ‘authority’, can definitely be
read that way.
IMO, let’s see how upstreams respond, tho. If it’s positive, we talk
again and /maybe/ continue, if it’s negative, we stop.
--
İ. Göktuğ Kayaalp / @cadadr / <https://www.gkayaalp.com/>
pgp: 024C 30DD 597D 142B 49AC 40EB 465C D949 B101 2427
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, (continued)
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Stefan Kangas, 2020/09/11
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Stefan Kangas, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Stefan Kangas, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28,
Göktuğ Kayaalp <=
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/11
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/11