[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes for emacs 28
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Changes for emacs 28 |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Sep 2020 17:32:35 +0300 |
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:52:49 +0200
> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>, Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>,
> Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
>
> Gregory> Indeed. I know this, but I don't know why this is the case (*).
> I
> Gregory> used to explicitly set Reply-To to emacs-devel@gnu.org in my
> MUA, but
> Gregory> Eli asked me to stop to do this.
>
> I think in that case rmail replies only to emacs-devel@, which means
> Eli has to add back the other recipients. Eli, do we need a "reply to
> 'From+To+CC+Reply-To'" feature in rmail? ("wide reply" in Gnus parlance).
I don't think I understand what that means (never used Gnus, sorry),
and don't remember the details of the issue. But in general, why
would someone need to set Reply-To to the list address when replying
to a message from the list? It should be automatic in any sensible
MUA, no?
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, (continued)
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Robert Pluim, 2020/09/10
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/10
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/09/10
- Message not available
- Message not available
- RE: Changes for emacs 28, Drew Adams, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Juri Linkov, 2020/09/09
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Juri Linkov, 2020/09/10
- Re: Changes for emacs 28, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/09