Re: Remote asynchronous processes

[Michael Albinus]

Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de> writes:

Hi Felipe,

>> If this is not feasible, then I can manage with this "non-checks-just-
>> run-this-command-as-is" approach.
>
> If integrated, it must be optional per connection. There might be remote
> hosts which could be treated this way; and other hosts which might not.

Finally, I've committed a respective patch to Emacs master. Read the
Tramp manual (info "(tramp) Improving performance of asynchronous remote 
processes")
about.

>> Gards

Best regards, Michael.