[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Aug 2020 19:08:48 +0300 |
> From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 21:40:02 +0200
> Cc: Alan Third <alan@idiocy.org>, Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>,
> raman <raman@google.com>
>
> Yeah, that's what I feared. I've now made the assertion conditional.
The assertion is gone, thanks.
> It might be cleaner to rewrite that function to explicitly check for
> all known tag types:
Something like that. Anything, really, because when I see the likes
of
# define lisp_h_XLP(o) ((void *) (uintptr_t) (o))
and know that 'o' can be a 64-bit integer whereas pointers are 32-bit
wide, I get shivers.
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, (continued)
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, Philipp Stephani, 2020/08/01
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, Andreas Schwab, 2020/08/01
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, Philipp Stephani, 2020/08/01
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/08/01
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, Philipp Stephani, 2020/08/01
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, Philipp Stephani, 2020/08/01
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, Philipp Stephani, 2020/08/01
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/08/01
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/08/01
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, Philipp Stephani, 2020/08/01
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, T.V Raman, 2020/08/01
- Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time, Alan Third, 2020/08/01