Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries

[Jonas Bernoulli]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> But after the proposed changes, almost none of the code will be under
>> "Code:", so the name will be a misnomer, no?
>
> Could be.  But that's a very minor cosmetic problem, AFAIC, and none of
> the suggested replacements for it sound particularly useful/enlightening
> either.  Which is why I wrote that "renaming it would provide very
> little concrete benefits".
>
> The costs/downsides of a rename are much more immediately apparent OTOH.

So does that mean that you approve of my first
variant of the updated description?

And Eli, are you okay with sticking to "Code:"?

I have two minor copy edits so far:
- s/that use/that you use/
- s/anyway././
Did you spot anything else?

     Jonas