Re: RFC: Automatic setup for bug-reference-mode

[Tassilo Horn]

"Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie> writes:

>>> Doesn't this need a non-nil NOERROR arg?
>>
>> I don't see why: if the backend doesn't implement the feature the
>> front-end function will signal an error, so the callers need to be
>> prepared to handle an error in any case.
>
> Then there's no need for branching based on the return value of
> re-search-forward, since we're assuming it will succeed or barf.

To make both of you happy pushed a version that uses NO-ERROR and
signals a more descriptive error if the "parent branch" line couldn't be
found.

Bye,
Tassilo