[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?
From: |
Arthur Miller |
Subject: |
Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Jun 2020 16:58:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> Someone will have to explain why this is useful.
>
> Or maybe you can just accept it as something other people might enjoy
> even tho you don't ;-)
>
>> Sitting and looking at other people's typing something, then erasing
>> and retyping, one character at a time, sounds like a huge waste of
>> time to me.
>
> Yet, as a teacher, I very often am exactly in that situation, where
> either the student or I write slowly on the board to try and express
> visually what we want to say. Now, "plain text" like we have in Emacs
> buffers isn't quite the same, but now that I have to teach via
> video-conferences, I regularly share my Emacs frame over Jitsi and they
> watch me slowly type code (and erase and retype) while explaining out
> loud what it is I'm doing.
>
> It may sound slow and painful, but the low speed is actually useful to
> give them time to understand, and the fact that it's done "live" makes
> the feedback loop much more effective when it takes several back&forth
> between the students and I before we come to an understanding.
>
> And of course, all that applies as well sometimes when discussing
> research ideas among peers.
>
>> I could use that same time to modify a different section of the same
>> document, or suggest a solution for a problem in parallel to several
>> others suggesting their solutions for the same problem (which would
>> need some processing on top of VC conflict resolution). I'm probably
>> missing something.
>
> Yes, we *also* do that (using Git, typically to share a TeX document or
> source code) and that's where the meat of work takes place, but at times
> the fast back&forth of "live editing" (or just talking) is very helpful.
>
>
> Stefan
Can this give some inspiration to you guys?
http://impromptu.moso.com.au/
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, (continued)
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Richard Stallman, 2020/06/01
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Bastien, 2020/06/01
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/06/01
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Bastien, 2020/06/01
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/06/01
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/06/06
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, tomas, 2020/06/06
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/06/06
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, tomas, 2020/06/06
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/06/06
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?,
Arthur Miller <=
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, tomas, 2020/06/06
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/06/06
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Thibaut Verron, 2020/06/06
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/06/06
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, tomas, 2020/06/06
- collaborative editing, Richard Stallman, 2020/06/06
- Re: collaborative editing, tomas, 2020/06/07
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2020/06/06
Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks?, Karl Fogel, 2020/06/01