[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Package naming
|
From: |
Daniele Nicolodi |
|
Subject: |
Re: Package naming |
|
Date: |
Sat, 30 May 2020 16:58:56 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 |
On 30-05-2020 16:42, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> what is the established convention for naming packages that mainly
>> provide a major mode? If I have a package that mainly provides
>> `foo-mode`, in the sense that all the "user facing" functionality is
>> enabled activating a major mode, should the package be named "foo" or
>> "foo-mode"?
>
> The convention is to obey the return value of
>
> M-: (if (zerop (mod (random) 2)) 'foo 'foo-mode) RET
>
> Not sure if we should try and fix those packages which don't follow the
> convention, tho.
I agree, it may be a never ending job.
Cheers,
Dan