Re: My perspective as a mid-level user on pros/cons of different editors

[Stefan Kangas]

João Távora <address@hidden> writes:

> Anyway, it is precisely in this sense that I try that Eglot
> provide the least amount of interactive commands and
> user options, and no keybindings at all.  So that people
> "see it" as little as possible of it.  They just see xref, project,
> flymake diagnostics, eldoc, etc. This is quite different
> from lsp-mode (at least the last time I looked at it).  Of
> course if major modes were in on the play, we could
> reduce the visibility of Eglot even more, maybe just
> reduce it to `eglot-connect` and `eglot-disconnect`, maybe
> call them `start-ide-ing` and `stop-ide-ing` for abstraction.

I like your thinking above.

I agree that, if we want users to interact with it, "eglot" is a pretty
hard to understand name.  Perhaps "lsp-start" and "lsp-stop" would be
okay here, if that makes sense.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas