|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: dash.el [was: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs] |
Date: | Sun, 17 May 2020 16:38:40 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 17.05.2020 16:01, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Most people (somewhat wrongly) think of GNU ELPA as a*distribution*> site for third party packages, like MELPA. Maybe that changes things. If we present ELPA as just a distribution site.If we regard ELPA just as distribution site, we shouldn't decide so lightly to leave important packages on ELPA, we should be tend more to adding them to core.
I would like to point out, as an author of several packages, that in my experience having a package in ELPA is _better_ than having it in the core.
The exception to that rule is more or less cases where the package is not only added but also enabled by default.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |