[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :alnum: broken?
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: :alnum: broken? |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Feb 2020 18:33:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> In Emacs's own compiler, all warnings are on by default:
> [...]
>> We all agree that this is as it should be, because although experienced
>> users would know how to enable the warnings, it is those who don't that need
>> them the most.
>
> Actually, from where I stand the warnings have two purposes:
>
> 1- Communicate with our users.
> 2- Help catch errors.
>
> And from that point of view, the first is the main reason why they're
> enabled by default.
byte-compiler warnings is a terrible method for communicating with users.
- Re: :alnum: broken?, (continued)
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/28
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Marcin Borkowski, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Stefan Monnier, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Óscar Fuentes, 2020/02/29
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Paul Eggert, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Andreas Schwab, 2020/02/26
- Re: :alnum: broken?, Mattias Engdegård, 2020/02/26