[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: datagram source port?

From: Robert Pluim
Subject: Re: datagram source port?
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 10:49:33 +0100

>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 18:07:17 +0100, Robert Pluim <address@hidden> said:

>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:43:46 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> said:
    >>> From: Robert Pluim <address@hidden>
    >>> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 11:41:41 +0100
    >>> Cc: address@hidden
    >>> That seems fragile. Anyway, given that we have
    >>> set-process-datagram-address, I donʼt see why we couldn't add
    >>> set-process-datagram-source-address as well. Eli, something like this?
    >>> Or we could add an optional parameter to set-process-datagram-address
    >>> to mean 'set source'.

    Eli> The latter, IMO, because the code is very similar.

    Robert> OK. Iʼve fixed a very embarassing bug with IPv6, and need to test it
    Robert> with a datagram process in server mode. Iʼve added it to my long 
    Robert> for this weekend (but itʼs vacation time, which helps :-)

I took another quick look at this, and noticed that the windows port
doesn't support datagram sockets at all, although the underlying
Winsock does. Is there a reason for that?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]