[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eintr.texi vs emacs-lisp-intro.texi
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: eintr.texi vs emacs-lisp-intro.texi |
|
Date: |
Mon, 30 Dec 2019 15:10:53 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
On December 30, 2019 2:42:36 PM GMT+02:00, Jean-Christophe Helary
<address@hidden> wrote:
> The gnu site has this link for the "An Introduction to Programming in
> Emacs Lisp" source download:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/texi/eintr.texi.tar.gz
>
> from
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/eintr.html
>
> But the Savannah repository has the following file:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/tree/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
The tar.gz file offered for download is just the contents of the doc/lispintro
directory of the Emacs repository. If you look inside the tarball, you will
see the same emacs-lisp-intro.texi file there.
> emacs.texi and ack.texi also still refer to eintr.
The Info file produced from the Introduction is called eintr.info, and
cross-references must use the actual name of the Info file. So this is
expected and perfectly OK.
> The HTML version of the Emacs manual has a link to "eintr.html" when
> the HTML file created by the "make docs" is emacs-lisp-intro.html
>
>
> It seems to me that there is an issue here...
Which of the above issues did you allude to?