[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?)
|
From: |
John Wiegley |
|
Subject: |
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?) |
|
Date: |
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 11:30:41 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (darwin) |
>>>>> "UB" == Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
UB> What puzzles me, is that there were so few commits when starting the
UB> project and
UB>
UB> Jim Blandy <address@hidden>
UB>
UB> redhat in 1985, really?
UB>
UB> From wikipedia:
UB> Founded in 1993, Red Hat has its corporate headquarters
UB>
UB> This is not really a serious issue, but I wondered whether the conversion
UB> process worked reliable, at least for the first commits.
Jim Blandy is that good at predicting trends. Never doubt the man.
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?), Stefan Monnier, 2019/08/17
Re: historial question: the first commits (is the conversion screwed?),
John Wiegley <=