[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: improve "next locus from <buffer>" messages
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: improve "next locus from <buffer>" messages |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Apr 2019 05:41:30 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (windows-nt) |
Felician Nemeth <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>> The attached patch changes it so the message is only output when the
>>>>> locus changes.
>
>>>>> Comments?
>
> I'm not completely sure, but the proposed patch seems to assume that
> next-error is only called from compilation-start.
No, that assumption is not made. I added the message in
compilation-start because otherwise it does not print a message when the
locus is changed.
I did not search the rest of emacs for places that set
next-error-last-buffer, so there may be other places that need a
message.
Yes; xref--xref-buffer-mode sets next-error-last-buffer without a
message.
It makes sense to print a message only when the error locus
change might be unexpected. If the user has started a compilation, they
expect error messages to come from *compilation*; similarly for *xref*.
The original discussion included things like flymake, which is invoked
in the background.
I'll take out the message in compilation-start.
--
-- Stephe
- improve "next locus from <buffer>" messages, Stephen Leake, 2019/04/03
- Re: improve "next locus from <buffer>" messages, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/04/04
- Re: improve "next locus from <buffer>" messages, Stephen Leake, 2019/04/04
- Re: improve "next locus from <buffer>" messages, Stephen Leake, 2019/04/07
- Re: improve "next locus from <buffer>" messages, Juri Linkov, 2019/04/08
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: improve "next locus from <buffer>" messages, Stephen Leake, 2019/04/08
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: improve "next locus from <buffer>" messages, Juri Linkov, 2019/04/13
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: improve "next locus from <buffer>" messages, Stephen Leake, 2019/04/14