[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?
|
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 16 May 2018 11:31:43 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
> The point is that sometimes I receive email containing mathematical
> formula in png format, which are displayed. So I checked and I have
>
> ,----
> | gnus-blocked-images is a variable defined in ‘gnus-art.el’.
> | Its value is nil
[...]
> Do I understand that in this case I am vulnerable?
Yes.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/15
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/15
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/16
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/15