|
From: | Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] * etc/NEWS: Document incompatibilities introduced by record types. |
Date: | Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:25:29 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 |
On 2017-12-11 16:37, Philipp Stephani wrote: > +*** … Don't define record types whose names clash with primitive type names. > +*** … Don't define record types named 'hash-table'. Could we just reserve these names and make it an error to define such records? Or, could we make type-of return `record-foo` instead of `foo`?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |