[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C99 compound literals in c-mode
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: C99 compound literals in c-mode |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Aug 2017 16:37:16 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) |
Hello, Nikolai.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:01:34 +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hello, Nikolai.
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:57:25 +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> >> struct a {
> >> int b;
> >> };
> > This seems to be correctly analysed and indented by CC Mode. You can
> > see this by doing C-c C-s on any line to get the syntactic analysis.
> > On the middle line, this shows ((inclass 332) (topmost-intro 332))
> > (where the "332" may vary, depending on the position in the file).
> > The "inclass" bit causes an indentation of c-basic-offset (here 8)
> > columns.
> > What indentation do you want here?
> Sorry, this was just there to give a complete example, it indents
> correctly as is.
OK.
> >> int
> >> main(void)
> >> {
> >> return (struct a){
> >> 0
> >> }.b;
> >> }
> > Here, the "0" line is being wrongly analysed as a
> > statement-block-intro, when it should be a brace-list-intro. The
> > problem is that brace lists are recognised only by their context in
> > the source code, rather than their internal structure. When a brace
> > list can appear virtually anywhere, this doesn't make sense.
> > The following patch causes brace lists to be recognised by their
> > internal structure too. Would you please apply it to CC Mode (in
> > directory .../lisp/progmodes), try it out, and let me know how well it
> > solves the problems with compound literals.
> This seems to be a patch for a newer version of CC Mode than that
> installed with my Emacs (25.2.1 via MacPorts). The function
> c-looking-at-statement-block isn’t even defined.
Apologies, I didn't read your original post properly. There have indeed
been quite a few changes to CC Mode since the code freeze for Emacs 25.2.
Would it be OK if I sent you a tarball (format .tar.gz) of the up to date
CC Mode sources (including this patch)? The total size is around 440 kB.
> Nikolai
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
Re: C99 compound literals in c-mode, Helmut Eller, 2017/08/15